Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Sunday, May 14, 2017

The Truth at all cost

The Great Divide 
Michael Hoffman
 

Delusion that is so intense it constitutes hallucination is nothing new. When the movie moguls chose to foist upon the public the definitive character assassination of the dissident English historian David Irving with their “Denial” film, it flopped at the box office, despite an A-list cast and top notch production values. But what “Denial” revealed about the insecurities of the “Holocaust” lobby was priceless: despite the image they project of omniscient certainty that the matter of Auschwitz’s homicidal gas chambers is definitively settled, and all who doubt are “deniers,” the movie-makers themselves have their own doubts!

The “Denial” movie is a gem for revisionists because of its admission that so-called “Holocaust survivors” can’t be called to the witness stand in criminal or civil court where there is an astute cross-examiner present, like David Irving in his libel suit against Deborah Lipstadt, or defense attorney Doug Christie during the 1985 Zundel trial. What does this say about the quality of their “testimony” when it cannot withstand knowledgeable cross-examination? This stunning admission from the movie “Denial” severely undercuts the Holocaustianity which has been elevated to a hallowed position of unassailable Sacred Dogma, which only a lunatic, neo-Nazi or an “anti-Semite” would contradict.

The Six Million kabbalism is only part of a wider epistemology which embraces Charles Fort’s study of the effect of belief in anomalies on humans. Fortean epistemology is not concerned particularly with “solving” the mystery of UFOs or Bigfoot, for example, but in studying the effect of belief in those anomalies on humans who accept them as true.

Reading Charles Fort (especially the last two of his four books) and Eric Hoffer’s
 The True Believer, led me to start to scrutinize the phenomenon of partisan cheerleading for “our side.” About 20 years ago this writer began to examine Right wing myths that were supposedly incumbent on a revisionist to believe. This is an oxymoron of course, since revisionism is not a belief system or a political framework for Left wing or Right wing triumphalism. It is the enemy of dogma and it subjects everything to a new vision (re-vision) based on the discovery of heretofore unknown facts. Asking a revisionist, “Whose side are you on?” ought to be futile. The true revisionist is on the “side” of a forever-digging historiography.

Partisans may agree with that idea in principle, but when the revisionist practices what he preaches they may howl, withdraw support, attack, calumniate or stalk angrily off. This occurred when we took a look at the boatload of Right wing nonsense floated over the past eighty years concerning the English Stuart King Charles I and the Puritan Army Commander Oliver Cromwell. Charles was put forth as an enemy of usury, Judaism and the occult. The Puritans were portrayed as Jew-worshipping pawns who opened the borders of Britain to the hordes of Antichrist for filthy lucres’ sake. I discovered that none of that cartoon was true and that the beneficiaries of the hoax were the partisans of the Church of Rome. The story had been given legs by Archibald Ramsay in
 The Nameless War and by Hilaire Belloc, a talented prose stylist who is something of a lay saint to conservative Catholics.

Our research (in the newsletter
 Revisionist History®), turned up the fact that Charles I and his Romanist wife were up to their necks in usury, Judaism and proto-masonic networks; that it would be his son, King Charles II, who first initiated Judaic immigration into England in earnest and not the Puritans, whose Parliament had in fact rebuffed Cromwell. Belloc’s “histories” of the Stuart monarchs are a palimpsest of fraud (or rank incompetence — he wrote hurriedly for money at this point in his career). Belloc himself was a usurer (he loaned at interest to his own family) and his definition of usury was the same defective one that had been modified by the situation ethics of the popes of the 16th century forward. Were these revisionist revelations welcomed? By some, yes. By many, no. I had let “our side” down, wink, wink. Wasn’t I aware that revisionism was just a device for making certain Protestants and most “Jews” look bad? Exposing the errors of “Saint” Belloc was also unforgivable.

What happened to all the high-minded ideals that we cast in the face of our enemies? “Truth at any cost,” no matter whose toes are stepped on? “Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger,” etc. For some people these are slogans that are employed in the war of ideas, nothing more. They believe we must win at any cost, with Machiavellian tactics behind a revisionist mask.

We discovered this again when we found at some cost, that a substantial portion of “Holocaust revisionism” is a project of rehabilitating the reputation of Adolf Hitler in order to have his movement resurrected. Yes, that sounds like a B-movie Hollywood script and when aimed at all revisionists or perhaps even the majority it is probably grossly unfair. But in our experience it is true of at least a substantial minority, maybe nearly half of WWII revisionists.

When we began to research two areas of Hitler’s curriculum vitae that were not as well studied as other aspects of his life, the findings did not bode well for his cult following. We looked at Corporal Hitler in World War I and its aftermath. Of the fact that he was a courageous soldier possessed of reckless disregard for his own life is not something we contest. But of his claim (and it was hardly his alone) that Germany had lost the war because of a Judaic “stab in the back,” there was almost no evidence. They lost the war mainly because they were burdened with the policies of obstinate and obtuse German generals; scapegoating Judaics in this regard was part of the Cryptocracy’s plan to extrude the mass of patriotic, Talmud-despising German Judaics, who identified with German culture and saw themselves as Germans first. The rabbis wanted these German-Judaics destroyed and Hitler was their avenging angel in this regard. After that issue of our newsletter was published many subscriptions were canceled.

More cancellations would follow when we researched and published the first new biography of Gregor Strasser in years. He was the National Socialist anti-usury leader (and master organizer) who was very inconvenient to have on hand after Hitler came to power and proceeded to buttress the very usurious forces he had campaigned against. Gregor Strasser was framed for a non-existent plot against the fuhrer and murdered (Leon Degrelle seconded Hitler’s lies about Gregor). More subscriptions were canceled after those facts were published. Hallucination trumps history not just among “the Jews” and “the Republican neoncons,” but among some of our own people.

To disenchant people of cherished delusions is a lonely vocation. Human nature being what it is, history teaches that people demand enchantment, a word which has come to be associated with love and beauty, but which has no association with truth, without which there is no authentic love or beauty.

Not to worry about us, however. Some of what “history teaches” has been put in suspended animation by this strange era of ours in which the clock on the wall of destiny is at five-minutes-to-midnight, and ticking. As we lost readers who were possessed by the same epistemology as the rabbis (“My-way-or-the-highway”), we kept or even attracted authentic revisionists and information connoisseurs. Thanks to that diehard readership we’re still here.

Which brings us to my book
 The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome which has just been published. This volume is a study in the laboratory of human delusion where five or more mutually contradictory beliefs are held by the papists; where monk Martin Luther’s Augustinian Superior General is a leader of the Cryptocracy; where the Kabbalah and Talmud are advanced by pontiffs known to consensus history as Judaism’s toughest adversaries, and where the primordial malignity of Pharaonic Egypt becomes the secret religion of the robber Church of Rome, which usurped the genuine Catholic and Apostolic Church of Dante, Francis of Assisi and Anthony of Padua.

Revisionist history consists in the never-ending enterprise of digging for facts in a cosmos where the original sin of our own subjectivity is forever leading us astray. The resistance to that allure is the task of the revisionist historian.

At its most fundamental level, the division among people is not between Republicans and Democrats; Judaics and gentiles; Protestants, Muslims and Catholics; or blacks and whites or rich and poor. It is between those who seek the truth at all cost, no matter how damaging and disruptive to their own prized and revered beliefs, and those who prefer the comfort of a lie. That, ladies and gentleman, is the great divide.

Michael Hoffman is the author of a new book, The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome. You can order it here.

Copyright©2017 Revisionisthistory.org


For Further Research:

REVISIONIST HISTORY® NEWSLETTER NO. 74 “RIGHT WING MYTHS WITH AN ENDLESS SHELF LIFE." Was John Calvin a "Jew"? Were the English Puritans who overthrew King Charles I agents of the Judaic Money Power?  Did Oliver Crowell readmit the Judaics to England? Many non-Zionist Right-wingers believe the answer to all three of these questions is yes. It is our hope that uncovering these Big Lies will serve to illustrate a defective epistemology. 20 page magazine.  
USA price $10.00. 
Canada: $11.00. Foreign: $12.00

REVISIONIST HISTORY® NEWSLETTER NO. 75 : "CORPORAL HITLER IN THE FIRST WORLD WAR." On the hundredth anniversary of the start of the fratricide, revisionist historian Michael Hoffman clears away the myths and disinformation surrounding Hitler’s military record from 1914 to 1918. What did the young Hitler actually do in the war? Did he deserve the Iron Cross?  How was he viewed by his fellow soldiers?  What were his authentic views of “the Great War”? At long last here is reliable, objective information that may surprise you, based on the latest cutting edge research and testimony. Also in this issue: “Resurrection Denial: A Cosmic Evil in Our Midst.” Government, the Churches and the media all obsess about and denounce “Holocaust denial” while the organized denial of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ merits little or no protest or outrage. USA price $9.00. Canada: $10.00. Foreign: $11.00  

REVISIONIST HISTORY® NEWSLETTER NO. 80: HITLER HAD HIM MURDERED: GREGOR STRASSER, THE GERMAN VISIONARY WHO COULD HAVE LED HIS NATION TO A NEW BIRTH OF FREEDOM. The Untold History of the Exemplary Life and foul Assassination of one of the Greatest German Leaders of the 20th century. USA price $10.00. Canada: $11.00. Foreign: $12.00

TO ORDER: U.S. Customers pay by check, money order or Discover card, VISA or Mastercard (please provide your account number and expiration date). Canada and Overseas pay by International Postal Money Order, a check in US dollars from a US bank, or Discover card, VISA or Mastercard (please provide your account number and expiration date). Be sure to specify what you are ordering and include your complete address. Send your payment to: Independent History and Research, Box 849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA. Checks must clear our bank first before orders can be shipped. Idaho residents please add 6% sales tax. Thank you! 

E-mail: hoffman[at]revisionisthistory.org (substitute @ for "at" in the preceding address) 

Legal Notice
Revisionist History® is a registered trademark of
Independent History & Research Box 849 • Coeur d'Alene  Idaho  83816  USA
__________________________ 

5 comments:

Greg Bacon said...

Thanks for the real history of why Germany lost WW I. I had thought that the Balfour Declaration was the main reason, that World Jewry cajoled England into refusing Germany's 1916 peace terms, because they claimed they could bring in the USA to help England and England would win, letting her set the peace terms, not Germany.

Dead Reckoning said...

I wanted to let you know I am about 175 pages into the new book - I have not had the time to go further yet as this past Monday started perhaps the busiest week at work I've had in a year.

I must say the book is exceeding my expectations and I also wanted to thank you how you memorialized the Occult church's destruction of the Latin Mass after V2 and what it did to so many of the faithful. Because it seems that tradcons share one characteristic with most Americans - and that is they have a historical memory that goes back about 20 minutes. By stating your personal memories of fervent and Holy Priests that were, for all practical purposes, killed by having the Novus Ordo of the Mass forced on them, you highlight what is being swept under the rug now by almost everyone including those in Traditionalist circles. Included with your Reverent Priest in the Capuchin Monastery, I remember that the Traditionalist parish where I was baptized in the 1970's was able to furnish more than half the Church with Holt statues and religious paintings that were laid curbside for trash collection by parishes 'going modern.' In the case of my home Parish in New York City, the Monsignore had used a great deal of parish funds to install a new High Altar. He was told a year later that he had to rip it out, and he refused. The Bishop of Brooklyn Queens fired him and that Priest of 45 years had to go live with his unmarried brother. 150 year old stone altars were laid out for garbage collection all over the North East, etc. Just do a search on EBAY - you could furnish and outfit an entire gothic church with 125 year old stained glass, pews, and candles made by the best craftsmen in France and Germany for about $35,000

One other point, I remember from one of your lectures that you went on a trip to Rome and were horrified by some of the occult imagery that showed up in various places. Years ago, partly based upon having read your earlier works on the occult, I thought the same thing to myself when I visited churches in Austria and in France that were built in the Baroque style and after the end of the gothic period. Things like triangles with an eyeball in it, signs of the zodiac arranged in many places, and in paintings that just seemed to show a little to much skin when depicting Saints and Christ. I went through the color plates added to the book - you have not even added I think, the best examples of Christ being depicted as some sort of fertility 'god' that exist. Your allegation regarding why Eve was turned a certain way also is quite earth shaking - I am not sure I agree and because its a religious painting I don't like to dwell on it - but you most certainly have a point that some of the 'religious' painters of the Renaissance might have tried to play some big occult gag on all of us.

apsterian said...

Poor Hoffman: Continues His Lying, Treason, Cowardice

Well, Hoffman, time again to take u to task for ur latest lies--even though u're surely right, so far as u go, at the end of ur piece, about the great divide being btwn truth and lies, but u don't and never give the WHY and how to this truth vs. lies, and hence, why and how u urself are such a lying liar who lies, as bad as any Jew--as in ur idiot book, "Usury...." For truth is necessarily premised upon the objective reality--whatever is reflected accurately by such reality is truth--truth is dependent and based upon that PRIOR objective (hence God-created) reality. U, Hoffman, are a SUBJECTIVIST as u pretend to "good-evil" Pelagianism, hence a liar.

So ur notes are interesting regarding English King, Charles II, beginning the large Jew immigration, but then u go astray, as usual, when u say Belloc was "usurer," but this is false, as "usury" could only be destructive under regime of central-banking (see Mises.org) and fiat-money, as I've noted over and again. And what actually do u know about "usury," as u fault Belloc?

For u don't understand basic economics, Hoffman, and less do u understand the subject of money. For a real (hence commodity-based) money system well and easily provides for lending at interest, and the Italians and Pope of the time are to be commended for revising and approving such lending at interest which greatly advanced Western civilization.

Next, u start to talking (writing) about Hitler, and u say Germans, "They lost the war mainly because they were burdened with the policies of obstinate and obtuse German generals." But fact is Germans were victims of a large conspiracy of Jew-bankers, along w. their suck-alongs among the goyim, naturally, who wanted, (a) Palestine, (b) League of Nations, (c) bolshevist Russia. And fact is Bolsheviks were heavily involved in Germany. So dear unc' Adolf is proven correct and justified once again, despite the lies of a filthy hereticalist, ignorant liar like u, Hoffman.

U say, "But of his [Hitler's] claim (and it was hardly his alone) that Germany had lost the war because of a Judaic “stab in the back,” there was almost no evidence." But fact is, Hoffman, u're just a Jew-serving liar, and u don't really look for the actual, real truth of things. Not only are u a liar, Hoffman, but u're a traitor to gentile humanity, desperately making excuses for ur Jewwy clients by whom u're intimidated so miserably, u cowardly scum--people see this cowardice on ur part, Hoffman, and it's what always works against u, rightfully so.

Hoffman mentions, "Talmud-despising German Judaics." But first there's obvious problem of presumption on part of the hereticalist, cowardly traitor and liar, Hoffman. And further, if they're soo "despising" of the filthy Talmud, then why do they still call themselves "Judaics," Hoffman? For no decent human being identifies with, and would call himself a Jew--may as well call himself a satanist, or psychopath, or child-molester. To say they're Jew is to show loyalty to the race, hence the culture, hence the Talmud, pure and simple.

So if u're for the truth, Hoffman, u'd withdraw ur stupid, lying book, "Usury...," but u won't, BECAUSE U'RE A LIAR. People see, eventually, the truth about u, Hoffman, a cowardly, ignorant, traitorous, willful, hereticalist liar, as in case of ur idiot book. And people are rightly disgusted by ur putrid, traitorous sucking-up to Jew monsters, Hoffman. I see little hope for u, buddy.

Johnny Gonzales said...

"To disenchant people of cherished delusions is a lonely vocation." You are so right Michael. Thanks.

Otto Juerging said...

What about Benjamin Freedman and his claim that his fellow Jews bore a responsibility for the German defeat in WW1. Isn't he a credible source ?
https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=9651