Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Wednesday, May 17, 2017

"Traditional Catholic" historians coverup truth

“In the case of Pico della Mirandola’s Judaic handler, Flavius Mithridates, protection and promotion was granted to Flavius by Pope Innocent VIII. With regard to Pico, he was exonerated of all imputations of heresy by Pope Alexander VI’s Brief of June 18, 1493. It is at this momentous historical juncture—which has proved invisible to the approved writers of the “classic Catholic histories,” and nearly three centuries before Rousseau and Kant—that a malevolent spirit was unleashed upon the Catholic world, emerging blatantly in the documents of the Second Vatican Council. No less than John-Paul II’s most revered cardinal-theologian bore witness to this astonishing fact in a book published in France, which was influential among the hierarchy, but otherwise languished in obscurity, neglected by those who insist there is no such phenomenon as a Renaissance occult papacy. The book was never translated into English by any enterprising researcher in all the annals of ‘conservative andtraditional' Catholic scholarship until we commissioned a translation of this key text for exposition in our new book, The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome.” 

Sunday, May 14, 2017

The Truth at all cost

The Great Divide 
Michael Hoffman

Delusion that is so intense it constitutes hallucination is nothing new. When the movie moguls chose to foist upon the public the definitive character assassination of the dissident English historian David Irving with their “Denial” film, it flopped at the box office, despite an A-list cast and top notch production values. But what “Denial” revealed about the insecurities of the “Holocaust” lobby was priceless: despite the image they project of omniscient certainty that the matter of Auschwitz’s homicidal gas chambers is definitively settled, and all who doubt are “deniers,” the movie-makers themselves have their own doubts!

The “Denial” movie is a gem for revisionists because of its admission that so-called “Holocaust survivors” can’t be called to the witness stand in criminal or civil court where there is an astute cross-examiner present, like David Irving in his libel suit against Deborah Lipstadt, or defense attorney Doug Christie during the 1985 Zundel trial. What does this say about the quality of their “testimony” when it cannot withstand knowledgeable cross-examination? This stunning admission from the movie “Denial” severely undercuts the Holocaustianity which has been elevated to a hallowed position of unassailable Sacred Dogma, which only a lunatic, neo-Nazi or an “anti-Semite” would contradict.

The Six Million kabbalism is only part of a wider epistemology which embraces Charles Fort’s study of the effect of belief in anomalies on humans. Fortean epistemology is not concerned particularly with “solving” the mystery of UFOs or Bigfoot, for example, but in studying the effect of belief in those anomalies on humans who accept them as true.

Reading Charles Fort (especially the last two of his four books) and Eric Hoffer’s
 The True Believer, led me to start to scrutinize the phenomenon of partisan cheerleading for “our side.” About 20 years ago this writer began to examine Right wing myths that were supposedly incumbent on a revisionist to believe. This is an oxymoron of course, since revisionism is not a belief system or a political framework for Left wing or Right wing triumphalism. It is the enemy of dogma and it subjects everything to a new vision (re-vision) based on the discovery of heretofore unknown facts. Asking a revisionist, “Whose side are you on?” ought to be futile. The true revisionist is on the “side” of a forever-digging historiography.

Partisans may agree with that idea in principle, but when the revisionist practices what he preaches they may howl, withdraw support, attack, calumniate or stalk angrily off. This occurred when we took a look at the boatload of Right wing nonsense floated over the past eighty years concerning the English Stuart King Charles I and the Puritan Army Commander Oliver Cromwell. Charles was put forth as an enemy of usury, Judaism and the occult. The Puritans were portrayed as Jew-worshipping pawns who opened the borders of Britain to the hordes of Antichrist for filthy lucres’ sake. I discovered that none of that cartoon was true and that the beneficiaries of the hoax were the partisans of the Church of Rome. The story had been given legs by Archibald Ramsay in
 The Nameless War and by Hilaire Belloc, a talented prose stylist who is something of a lay saint to conservative Catholics.

Our research (in the newsletter
 Revisionist History®), turned up the fact that Charles I and his Romanist wife were up to their necks in usury, Judaism and proto-masonic networks; that it would be his son, King Charles II, who first initiated Judaic immigration into England in earnest and not the Puritans, whose Parliament had in fact rebuffed Cromwell. Belloc’s “histories” of the Stuart monarchs are a palimpsest of fraud (or rank incompetence — he wrote hurriedly for money at this point in his career). Belloc himself was a usurer (he loaned at interest to his own family) and his definition of usury was the same defective one that had been modified by the situation ethics of the popes of the 16th century forward. Were these revisionist revelations welcomed? By some, yes. By many, no. I had let “our side” down, wink, wink. Wasn’t I aware that revisionism was just a device for making certain Protestants and most “Jews” look bad? Exposing the errors of “Saint” Belloc was also unforgivable.

What happened to all the high-minded ideals that we cast in the face of our enemies? “Truth at any cost,” no matter whose toes are stepped on? “Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger,” etc. For some people these are slogans that are employed in the war of ideas, nothing more. They believe we must win at any cost, with Machiavellian tactics behind a revisionist mask.

We discovered this again when we found at some cost, that a substantial portion of “Holocaust revisionism” is a project of rehabilitating the reputation of Adolf Hitler in order to have his movement resurrected. Yes, that sounds like a B-movie Hollywood script and when aimed at all revisionists or perhaps even the majority it is probably grossly unfair. But in our experience it is true of at least a substantial minority, maybe nearly half of WWII revisionists.

When we began to research two areas of Hitler’s curriculum vitae that were not as well studied as other aspects of his life, the findings did not bode well for his cult following. We looked at Corporal Hitler in World War I and its aftermath. Of the fact that he was a courageous soldier possessed of reckless disregard for his own life is not something we contest. But of his claim (and it was hardly his alone) that Germany had lost the war because of a Judaic “stab in the back,” there was almost no evidence. They lost the war mainly because they were burdened with the policies of obstinate and obtuse German generals; scapegoating Judaics in this regard was part of the Cryptocracy’s plan to extrude the mass of patriotic, Talmud-despising German Judaics, who identified with German culture and saw themselves as Germans first. The rabbis wanted these German-Judaics destroyed and Hitler was their avenging angel in this regard. After that issue of our newsletter was published many subscriptions were canceled.

More cancellations would follow when we researched and published the first new biography of Gregor Strasser in years. He was the National Socialist anti-usury leader (and master organizer) who was very inconvenient to have on hand after Hitler came to power and proceeded to buttress the very usurious forces he had campaigned against. Gregor Strasser was framed for a non-existent plot against the fuhrer and murdered (Leon Degrelle seconded Hitler’s lies about Gregor). More subscriptions were canceled after those facts were published. Hallucination trumps history not just among “the Jews” and “the Republican neoncons,” but among some of our own people.

To disenchant people of cherished delusions is a lonely vocation. Human nature being what it is, history teaches that people demand enchantment, a word which has come to be associated with love and beauty, but which has no association with truth, without which there is no authentic love or beauty.

Not to worry about us, however. Some of what “history teaches” has been put in suspended animation by this strange era of ours in which the clock on the wall of destiny is at five-minutes-to-midnight, and ticking. As we lost readers who were possessed by the same epistemology as the rabbis (“My-way-or-the-highway”), we kept or even attracted authentic revisionists and information connoisseurs. Thanks to that diehard readership we’re still here.

Which brings us to my book
 The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome which has just been published. This volume is a study in the laboratory of human delusion where five or more mutually contradictory beliefs are held by the papists; where monk Martin Luther’s Augustinian Superior General is a leader of the Cryptocracy; where the Kabbalah and Talmud are advanced by pontiffs known to consensus history as Judaism’s toughest adversaries, and where the primordial malignity of Pharaonic Egypt becomes the secret religion of the robber Church of Rome, which usurped the genuine Catholic and Apostolic Church of Dante, Francis of Assisi and Anthony of Padua.

Revisionist history consists in the never-ending enterprise of digging for facts in a cosmos where the original sin of our own subjectivity is forever leading us astray. The resistance to that allure is the task of the revisionist historian.

At its most fundamental level, the division among people is not between Republicans and Democrats; Judaics and gentiles; Protestants, Muslims and Catholics; or blacks and whites or rich and poor. It is between those who seek the truth at all cost, no matter how damaging and disruptive to their own prized and revered beliefs, and those who prefer the comfort of a lie. That, ladies and gentleman, is the great divide.

Michael Hoffman is the author of a new book, The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome. You can order it here.

Copyright©2017 Revisionisthistory.org

For Further Research:

REVISIONIST HISTORY® NEWSLETTER NO. 74 “RIGHT WING MYTHS WITH AN ENDLESS SHELF LIFE." Was John Calvin a "Jew"? Were the English Puritans who overthrew King Charles I agents of the Judaic Money Power?  Did Oliver Crowell readmit the Judaics to England? Many non-Zionist Right-wingers believe the answer to all three of these questions is yes. It is our hope that uncovering these Big Lies will serve to illustrate a defective epistemology. 20 page magazine.  
USA price $10.00. 
Canada: $11.00. Foreign: $12.00

REVISIONIST HISTORY® NEWSLETTER NO. 75 : "CORPORAL HITLER IN THE FIRST WORLD WAR." On the hundredth anniversary of the start of the fratricide, revisionist historian Michael Hoffman clears away the myths and disinformation surrounding Hitler’s military record from 1914 to 1918. What did the young Hitler actually do in the war? Did he deserve the Iron Cross?  How was he viewed by his fellow soldiers?  What were his authentic views of “the Great War”? At long last here is reliable, objective information that may surprise you, based on the latest cutting edge research and testimony. Also in this issue: “Resurrection Denial: A Cosmic Evil in Our Midst.” Government, the Churches and the media all obsess about and denounce “Holocaust denial” while the organized denial of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ merits little or no protest or outrage. USA price $9.00. Canada: $10.00. Foreign: $11.00  

REVISIONIST HISTORY® NEWSLETTER NO. 80: HITLER HAD HIM MURDERED: GREGOR STRASSER, THE GERMAN VISIONARY WHO COULD HAVE LED HIS NATION TO A NEW BIRTH OF FREEDOM. The Untold History of the Exemplary Life and foul Assassination of one of the Greatest German Leaders of the 20th century. USA price $10.00. Canada: $11.00. Foreign: $12.00

TO ORDER: U.S. Customers pay by check, money order or Discover card, VISA or Mastercard (please provide your account number and expiration date). Canada and Overseas pay by International Postal Money Order, a check in US dollars from a US bank, or Discover card, VISA or Mastercard (please provide your account number and expiration date). Be sure to specify what you are ordering and include your complete address. Send your payment to: Independent History and Research, Box 849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA. Checks must clear our bank first before orders can be shipped. Idaho residents please add 6% sales tax. Thank you! 

E-mail: hoffman[at]revisionisthistory.org (substitute @ for "at" in the preceding address) 

Legal Notice
Revisionist History® is a registered trademark of
Independent History & Research Box 849 • Coeur d'Alene  Idaho  83816  USA

Saturday, April 29, 2017

The Disgusting Face of Liberal Churchianity

Anglican Archbishop seeks a ban on David Irving’s books in libraries

Here is one reason why the Anglican Church, like all liberal denominations in Britain and Europe, is a ghost-like shell of its former self: the craven servility of its erstwhile Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, in obsequious submission to the requirements of the Zionist inquisition. 

“His Lordship" would be the first to howl in outrage if the Babylonian Talmud, with its racist imprecations against Jesus, Mary and the goyim, were to be withdrawn from the same libraries where Williams demands a ban on the World War II history books of David Irving. 

Good news: Manchester University librarians have rebuffed this clown. Mr. Irving’s dissident histories will continue to be displayed. The report is here


Thursday, April 27, 2017

Ernst Zundel barred from residing in the USA

Ernst Zundel has been barred from residing in the U.S.

By Michael Hoffman

Publisher, author, pacifist and German patriot Ernst Zündel, who has served more than seven years' imprisonment in U.S., Canadian and German jails for thought crimes, has been denied residence in the U.S on the basis that he is a thought criminal. In true Orwellian fashion, his life-long struggle against the defamation and group-libel of the German people has been classified as a hate crime.



Tuesday, April 25, 2017

The Other Side of the Talmud Debate

The Other Side of the Talmud Debate

In his reply, Hoffman points out the use of misdirection and censored texts in the Oxford lecture and the numerous errors and omissions employed to demonize Talmud critics and whitewash the Babylonian Talmud. Hoffman documents Talmudic racism and permission for homicide by quoting Rabbis Shimon ben Yohai and Moses Maimonides, as well as from the Gemara itself, and rabbinic authorities having the status of Posek Ha-dor and Gadol Ha-dor.


Friday, April 14, 2017

Erasing the perpetrators of the Crucifixion from history

O my people, what have I done to you? How have I hurt you? Answer me. 

I led you out of Egypt. 
From slavery I set you free.
I brought you into a land of promise; You have prepared a cross for me. 
I led you as a shepherd;
I brought you safely through the sea; Fed you manna in the desert;
You have prepared a cross for me. 
I fought for you in battles,
I won you strength and victory;
Gave you a royal crown and sceptre; You have prepared a cross for me. 
I planted you, my vineyard,
And cared for you most tenderly;
Looked for abundant fruit and found none - Only the cross you made for me. 

With a beam of cloud I led thee,
And to Pilate you lead me,
My people, what have I done to thee?

I gave you a crown of kingship,
And you give me a crown of thorns,
You are my people — why do you torment me?

Listen to my pleading
And do not turn away from me.
You are my people: will you reject me? For you I suffer bitterly.

The preceding text is a modernized, condensed translation of William Herebert’s rendering (in the 14th century) of the original, “Improperia" (ChristReproaches), an early medieval Catholic litany from the 9th century. 

Erasing the perpetrators of the Crucifixion from history

By Michael Hoffman

“At a Palm Sunday Mass, Pope Francis emphasized that ‘too many act like Pontius Pilate, denying justice' and he urged the faithful to see the cross as ‘the royal seat of God.' He added, 'If the mystery of evil is unfathomable, then the reality of Love poured through him is infinite.”

In fact, Pontius Pilate tried to acquit Jesus (Matthew 27:19-24). The Talmud agrees, stating that Jesus “had close connections with non-Jewish authorities and those authorities were interested in his acquittal.” (BT Sanhedrin 43a). 

So how is it that the media, popes of Rome, Protestants, conservative pundits (Bill OReilly, Judge Andrew Napolitano and many others), lay most of the blame on Pilate, and render him and the Romans generally as the evil perpetrators of the Crucifixion, while the actual perpetrators (I Thessalonians 2:14-15) are erased from history? 

When will theyand Pope Francishave sufficient manhood to declare on Palm Sunday and Good Friday: 

Too many act like the Jewish Pharisees, denying justice to the Palestinians, and through their influence over the modern media, slandering Zionism’s political and religious rivals in the West. 

(Hoffman, one of the most controversial and banned writers of the 21st century, is the author of Judaism’s Strange Gods and Judaism Discovered).

Thursday, April 13, 2017

Sanhedrin condemns Jesus to death

The Vatican and the media blame the Romans, but the documentary record states otherwise:

The Sanhedrin condemned Jesus Christ to death

Research by Michael Hoffman


Tuesday, April 11, 2017

Poison Gas: Churchill’s Weapon of Choice

Forbidden Facts Banned by the Corporate Media

Poison Gas: 
Winston Churchill’s Weapon of Choice

“During the Kurdish rebellion against British dictatorship in 1920, Churchill remarked that he simply did not understand the ‘squeamishness’ surrounding the use of gas by civilized Great Britain as a weapon of terror. ‘I am strongly in favor of using gas against uncivilized tribes, it would spread a lively terror,’ he remarked.”

News credit: Michael Hoffman  www.revisionisthistory.org
Saddam Hussein used poison gas against Iranians after he received President Reagan’s approval for his war with Iran:

News credit: Michael Hoffman • www.revisionisthistory.org

Your donation keeps us digging for news suppressed by the Establishment media!

Subscribe to historian Michael Hoffman’s Revisionist History Newsletter
Hard copy bulletin published six times a year:


Thursday, April 06, 2017

Assad using poison gas? It doesn’t add up

In Seymour Hersh’s recent book The Killing of Osama Bin Laden he touches on the infamous sarin gas attack on Syrian civilians back in 2013. Children died in that as well. It turned out that the sarin used in that attack was different than the gas that Assad had given to the U.S. which we took possession of and destroyed. 

The theory is that certain entities in our own U.S. government enabled rebel factions in Syria to use the gas on their own people, in order to entice the U.S. into war with Assad. Luckily, under Obama, the ruse didn’t work. Unfortunately, this time this black op has been successful.

It makes exactly zero sense that six days after Assad finally “wins”  with the U.S. proclaiming that his removal from power is no longer our focus   that he suddenly sees fit in early April to engage in the ultimate provocative behavior that paints a target on his back all over again. 

Why on earth would anyone of sound mind do such a thing? 

And yet, Charles Blow “explains” in the New York Times, that loosening the grip on Assad “emboldened” him to poison a few civilians with gas. 

For what purpose? Even if someone has nothing but contempt for Assad, normal rules of common sense still apply. Assad is not stupid or a maniac, he is someone who wants to stay in power. The United States had granted him that just last week. 

You tell me who poisoned those poor souls. It wasn’t Assad.  

It pains me that Syrian civilians are being used in this manner, as pawns, to advance an agenda. But ample precedent exists for just that.


Love as Jesus did

Jesus shattered a pagan template of violence and revenge against those who harm us.

By doing so He overcame all of His enemies.

Herod’s military might, his political dynasty and that of the Roman emperors and their vast armies, have all vanished.

They were swept away by a young man who advanced the seditious belief that might does not make right; insisting instead that we learn to love our enemies instead of hating them.

Jesus taught us to resist the temptations of retaliation and revenge, and turn the other cheek to those who afflict and oppress us.

We pray for a change of heart and for redemption and salvation for our enemies.

May we treat others as we wish to be treated.

That is the Resurrection message of Jesus Christ this Easter.

— Michael Hoffman

Wednesday, March 15, 2017

Henry Herskovitz, Righteous Judaic

A progressive American is mostly a jerked puppet who’s outraged solely at preselected triggers. At his Deir Yassin Remembered website, lifelong Ann Arbor, Michigan resident Henry Herskovitz explains:
Jackie Robinson and Jewish Power
Emotions naturally flare at watching the PBS special shown on MLK day of the career of baseball icon Jackie Robinson. Who could not grow emotional when reminded that Jackie and wife Rachel were bumped twice from the planes carrying them to a spring training camp in Florida? What outrage is felt by viewers recognizing that this discrimination they experienced came merely because of the color of their skin and nothing else!
Yes, we get it. And we feel for the Robinsons; their plight was genuine. Racial discrimination still exists in America.
But what about Muhammed Ali, my friend and sandwich shop operator in the Balata refugee camp near Nablus, Palestine? Muhammed grew up in Haifa, graduated high school there and earned a technical degree before being bumped, not just from an airplane, but from his home town. Yes, he cannot return to Haifa and swim in the Mediterranean the way his family did before him. He cannot even travel to the Haram esh-Sharif/Noble Sanctuary to practice his religion. Like Jackie Robinson, Muhammed is the wrong “color”: neither ethnic Jew, secular Jew, nor religious Jew.
Isn’t there a story here as well, PBS? Perhaps even more compelling than Robinson’s, because Muhammed has yet to break his “color” barrier. Hello, Hollywood, isn’t his story worthy—at least—of a two-hour documentary?
Born Jewish, Herskovitz soured on his tribe after a trip to Israel. He saw firsthand the gross brutality of the illegally founded terror state. Back in Ann Arbor, Herskovitz wanted to give a presentation to his synagogue, Beth Israel, but the rabbi nixed the idea. Outraged, Herskovitz has staged an anti-Israel protest outside Beth Israel each Saturday for 13+ years. Though Herskovitz loves to ride his motorcycle long distance, he always come back in time to stand with his signs. A small band join him.
Last year, I visited Herskovitz at home and saw anti-Israel messages everywhere, including on the salt shaker, the fridge, the car, the garage and even the fireplace’s ember screen. To some neighbors’ dismay, Herskovitz paid to have “STOP US AID TO ISRAEL” and “LIBERATE PALESTINE / END ISRAEL” incised into the sidewalk outside his house.
Herskovitz routinely wears an anti-Israel T-shirt and baseball cap, and on his car are several anti-Israel stickers.
In 2015, Herskovitz and his allies paid for a billboard in Detroit, “AMERICA FIRST NOT ISRAEL.” Herskovitz:
The strategy behind this billboard’s statement, ‘America First, Not Israel’, is to drive a wedge between those who feel American interests are not served by fighting wars for Israel, and the Israel-firsters in this country who manipulate our leaders into the false premise that Israel is the ally of the United States.
Charges of anti-semitism quickly flooded in, and the message was taken down, so it was put up at another, more out of the way spot, until this second billboard company was also pressured to remove it. Henry:
Jewish Power Never Sleeps
Like Michigan rust on vehicles, Jewish Power remains relentless at getting its way. Just when Witness for Peace was to announce the installation of a local billboard—sponsored by sister organization Deir Yassin Remembered and carrying our message “America First, Not Israel”—we get “the call”. The billboard […] was taken down by Adams Outdoor Advertising one week after installation, effectively terminating a three-month contract.
That’s how long it took for Jewish Power to pressure Adams’ executives into seeing things their way. The call came from General Manager Mike Cannon, who admitted to receiving phone calls asking that the billboard be taken down. Mike claimed he was not the one who made the decision, and provided the phone number of Vice President of Human Resources Brian Grant to field my questions.
Brian developed a mantra for the conversation we shared: “the decision to remove the billboard was a collective decision and was made because the message did not meet Adams’ company standards. We removed the billboard and refunded your money. And that’s all I can say.” Brian fell back on this mantra at least a half dozen times during our 20-minute discussion. And reminded me that, since a clause in the contract allowed Adams to terminate at any time, there was no “breach of contract”.
Q: What were the company standards?
A: [Brian was not going to go into that.]
Q: How do you square the fact that the message was initially approved by Adams?
A: It should not have been approved; due diligence was not applied.
Q: Who were the people complaining about the billboard?
A: [Would not answer that.]
Q: What were the organizations calling for the billboard to be taken down?
A: [See above.]
Q: Would the decision to pull the billboard have been the same had the message been simply America First?
A: Well, you’re asking a hypothetical.
Q: You mean Adams would NOT run a billboard saying America First?
A: [No answer.]
And so it goes. By deception shall you make war. DYR and WfP lose the round; Jewish Power wins. We move on.
When Russia Today reported on this billboard controversy, the first commenter said, “Calling Americans to put interest of America ahead of Isreal is branded as anti semitic. That goes to prove how much the Zionist wants the Americans to be brain dead!”
Brainwashed, Americans also cringe at “Jewish power,” but it’s OK so declare and celebrate “black power,” “Latino power,” “gay power” or “women’s power,” etc. Aren’t AIPAC, the flushing of the U.S.S. Liberty down the memory hole, the abject kowtowing of DC politicians to Tel Aviv and our endless war against Israel’s enemy all examples of Jewish power?
But you’re dead wrong, anti-semite! As eternal victims everywhere, Jews are always powerless, so only Jew haters would dare to suggest otherwise.
“Are you a Jew hater?” I asked Herskovitz. His answer:
“Hate” is a term used by my opponents, not by me. “Hate speech” is used by the Hasbara folks as an epithet thrown at their perceived enemies. Like “Holocaust Denier,” the users of these terms do not define them, but merely slime those whose voices they want to silence. I’m a “hater” because Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law Center says I am. Could Mr. Potok be a child molester because I make the claim?
I try not to play defense. My experience in these matters tells me that once I start down the slippery slope of “denial,” or defending my position, this tactic merely fuels opponents’ appetite for further questions. It answers nothing. The best defense is a good offense.
Even if I were to admit a hatred of an ethnic/religious group, an interesting question arises. Assume this group was Irish Protestants, and I said I hated them. Who would care? But admitting to hating Jews is another story altogether. Perhaps the phrase “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize” makes sense when used in this context.
And the question becomes rather ludicrous when you consider that I love my sister, her children and grandchildren; ditto for my Virginia cousins, their children and grandchildren. I’m even scheduled to attend a Bat Mitzvah of one of these kids this summer. If you were to tell this group I’m a Jew hater, you would not be believed.
So no, Herskovitz has no beef with ordinary Jews, or he would have to disown his entire family, but haven’t Jewish policy makers, media masters, opinion shapers and bankers used their disproportionate sway over the makeup and direction of this country to harm not just their Muslim enemies, but ordinary Americans?
In putting up the billboard, “AMERICA FIRST / NOT ISRAEL,” Herskovitz merely wants our country to serve its own citizens, and not be distorted, corrupted, discredited and destroyed by a foreign agenda, and I, as an American, can’t help but concur.

Disraeli's stratagem of misdirection

Disraeli's stratagem of misdirection

As an inducement to readers of this column to subscribe to our printed Revisionist History newsletter, with its exclusive subscriber content, we are publishing this excerpt from a recent issue (thanks to Henry Makow for reminding us of its relevance and significance). Here we point out a stratagem of misdirection, which Rothschild agent Benjamin Disraeli aimed at the Right wing, and which has managed to seduce many on the Right ever since, resulting in the occlusion of our ability to perceive the actual enabling force behind Zionist power in gentile nations.


Where in Coningsby, with its elucidation 
of Disraeli's "insider" revelations ascribed
to a Rothschild-like character, is there a 
depiction of the gentiles' responsibility 
and culpability for Sidonia's power?

Excerpted from an extended study in Revisionist History newsletter, no. 85. To subscribe:

by Michael Hoffman 

….Judaism is the mother of racism and it is always a shame when other nations of people adopt that which is in its essence, rabbinic. By racism we do not signify concern for marrying one's own kind, which is the natural law. We refer to the racism that exhibits a need to disrespect, castigate, humiliate and oppress other races, while denying them equal rights before the law, which is the Talmudic attitude in a nutshell. Let us return to Coningsby. Are the declarations Disraeli has his character Sidonia put forth entirely pure revelation, or is there in this stew a pinch of misdirection?

bd (1).jpg
While the novel is out of fashion now (no major press has kept it in print, though other novels by Disraeli have never been out of print in the catalog of major publishing houses), it was very much in favor during the 19th and early 20th century among gentile conspiracy researchers. They took it at face value, which was a blunder. It has been the objective of the Cryptocracy since at least the past six hundred years, to create among occult-watchers and conspiracy theorists the idea that it is, "the Jews primarily" who are responsible for wars and revolutions, as Disraeli wrote:

"The first Jesuits were Jews; that mysterious Russian diplomacy which so alarms Western Europe is organized and principally carried on by Jews; that mighty revolution which is at this moment preparing in Germany, and which will be in fact a second and greater Reformation, and of which so little is known yet in England, is entirely developing under auspices of Jews..."

By implanting this meme of a nearly exclusive conspiratorial role for Judaic persons, Disraeli (and the Right-wing conspiracy researchers who took their cues from his books), distracted attention from the gentiles who were the partners of the Judaic conspirators. In some cases Judaics were subordinate to those gentile conspirators (whether masonic, or as was the case in the Vatican, neo-Catholic). Without these non-Jews, the Judaic malefactors could not have advanced an inch in nations such as England, where their rise in the 19th century was spectacular, as it was in Rome, when Rothschild loans began to be made to the papacy not long after Aug. 18, 1830, when Pope Pius VIII, in Datum in audientia, abolished the last remaining ecclesiastical penalties for taking a profit on loans. Henceforth, unrepentant Catholic usurers engaged in the criminal trade were welcome at the Communion rail (and remain welcome today).

The Cryptocracy has a record of concealing the extent of the history of the gentile partnership with the Judaics. They preferred to propagate
myths, such as that usury in the early Renaissance was mainly in the hands of "Jews," when the opposite was the case, or that the Rothschilds simply sailed into Britain with their vast wealth and took over.


The English aristocracy could have consistently obstructed Rothschild bankers in the land had they resurrected back into force the ruling of one of the most esteemed legal authorities in the chronicle of their nation, Sir Edward Coke, [1551-1634] Lord Chief Justice of England. Coke had reaffirmed that "the Jews" were "perpetui inimici" ("perpetual enemies"), and that the possibility of their sincere conversion to Christianity was only remota potentia (a remote possibility). "Hence between them and us, as between us and the devil," declared Coke, "there can be no peace, for as the Apostle saith, 2. Cor. 6. 15, Quae autem conventio Christi ad Belial, aut quoe, pars fideli cum infedeli?" ("What covenant has Christ with Belial? Or what has a believer to do with an infidel?").

Standing on this ancient summation of the legal relations in England between Judaics and Christians, Queen Victoria and her subjects would have had every legal right to bar the Rothschilds from conducting banking and commerce. It was in their power to anoint or suppress the Rothschilds, Montefiores and Disraelis. Instead, in all cases and many more not cited here, by way of their gentile co-conspirators Judaics were granted pathways to power and rulership over the Christian population. Where in Coningsby, with its elucidation of Disraeli's "insider" revelations ascribed to a Rothschild-like character, is there a depiction of the gentiles' responsibility and culpability for Sidonia's power?

Disraeli's Coningsby burdened the Right wing with more than a hundred years of faulty conspiracy history that rendered the gentile role in the evil, as either almost non- existent, or an anomaly on the part of a mere handful of renegades. This writer is a witness to the psychology in America in 1973 when the majority of the over-50 generation found it almost impossible to believe that gentile President Nixon could have committed crimes in the course of the Watergate scandal. They believed it about the Judaic Henry Kissinger, but not about Nixon. We have analyzed this Cryptocracy-seeded phenomenon in our booklet, The Role of the Merchants of Venom: The Trend Toward Shadow Play in the Resistance to Judaism and Zionism.


After Coningsby, the Sidonia character appears again in Disraeli's novel Tancred, set in the Middle East. Like its predecessor, this book also contains copious Rothschild references, as well as Disraeli's advancement of the blasphemous occult thesis that both Jesus Christ and the Jews who had him killed "fulfilled the beneficent intention" of God, and "saved the human race."

An Irish member of Parliament, Augustus Stafford O'Brien opined, "Must I cheer Disraeli when he declares there is no difference between those who crucified Christ and those who kneel before Christ crucified?” 

Human Alchemy depends on the 
union of irreconcilable opposites

Thomas Power O'Connor identified the distinctive characteristic of magical occultism manifested by Disraeli: "One of the stratagems which may be traced in all his writings and speeches from the very commencement of his career...is to so mix up opposing principles as to make them appear identical...here, in religion, we have seen how the belief that Christ was an impostor and the belief that He is God, form exactly the same faith." 14

Tancred is otherwise packed with soothing conservative platitudes about patriotism, intending to show that "Jews" were its champions. The book's treatment of race is genuine, however. Disraeli has Sidonia say, "A Saxon race, protected by its insular position, has stamped its diligent and methodic character on the century...All is race; there is no other truth."

Disraeli has another character, the woman "Eva," daughter of a Judaic banker, argue at length that Jews are not guilty of deicide, and that of all the superior races on earth like the Saxons, the "Jews" are above them, since God had been "endowing them with faculties superior to those of the nations among whom they dwell..."

This is the masonic formula for world dominion "on the Level and the Square," superior Aryans on the level with the even more superior "Jews," in an invincible racial imperium that's absolutely a "square deal." 

As circumstances require, chameleon Judaism manifests on the race-denying Left and on the racially-conscious Right. The latter fact is missed by many who don't discern the dynastic nature of the alliances that have been made in capitalist nations of the West between the Khazar-Judaics and Sephardim on the one hand, and upper class and plutocrat Caucasians….

Copyright©2016 by Michael Hoffman. All Rights Reserved.